Faith and the thinking Christian: Does faith hinder scientific discovery?

Faith and the thinking Christian: Does faith hinder scientific discovery?

Back when folks wore hats and overcoats, they laid them aside when they entered a theater or restaurant. They would check their outerwear at the Coat Check so they could enjoy their activity unhindered. When finished, they would pick up their coats and hats.

Today scientists often hear that they need to do something similar when stepping into the laboratory. Scientists can’t be hindered by a supernatural worldview when researching the natural world. They must first check their faith at the door to keep it from getting in the way and then pick it up again as they leave the laboratory.

Want to read more? The full text of this article is available via subscription. Below are the questions and answers associated with this study.

Read Jeremiah 8:2; 10:8-11; Deuteronomy 17:3; and Psalm 90:2.

It’s been stated that science could not make much progress in ancient times until Aristotle and Plato shed the culture’s pagan beliefs, revealing that gods don’t exist within nature itself. How were these Hebrew prophets well ahead of the Greek philosophers?

Modern science and, before it, Greek philosophy discredited superstitious beliefs that there are gods within nature who control how things work. But give credit where credit is due. The Lord, who transcends nature, dispelled such pagan lies much earlier! God exists apart from, and before, the created world that he brought into existence. He will not stand for people turning created things into gods that replace him. Moses and Jeremiah condemned pagan worship and, along with it, the superstitious notions of how nature worked. 

It’s often forgotten that Martin Luther and the other Reformers did much to free the medieval worldview from Aristotelian philosophy, which severely hindered understanding God’s two books (as Augustine called them)—God’s Word and God’s works. Luther restored the proper hermeneutic to studying Scripture: The truth of Scripture would be uncovered by looking to the data or the text to let it say what it meant and mean what it said. He did not depend on the opinions or beliefs of others, even those who were revered as scholars. This is the historical-grammatical method of hermeneutics, which restored the truth of the gospel to the church.  

But this freedom also led Christians who were scientists to apply the same approach to understanding God’s world. They would study the data to see what it said but then rest solely on the a priori assumptions handed down from Aristotle. The Lutheran Johannes Kepler changed science forever when he directly and meticulously observed the orbit of Mars and discarded the inadequate philosophy of Aristotle that had constrained it for centuries. 

Read Genesis 1.

Agree/disagree: God’s revelation of how he created the universe makes scientific discovery possible and even encourages it.

Scientific discovery possible? Agree: God created the world in an orderly manner—forming the world in the first three days and filling it in the next three. The rhythm of God’s creating work in six normal days that cycle through light and darkness, along with the creation of the sun and moon as signs for days and seasons and years, show the orderliness of creation. Without such design and order, which we call the laws of nature and are expressed mathematically by scientists, we couldn’t carry out science as we know it.

Does Genesis 1 even encourage scientific discovery? Someone could disagree that God doesn’t command us to follow the scientific method per se or to summarize what we observe in creation as the laws of nature in mathematical formulas.

At the same time, it’s probably unhelpful and even arrogant of modernity to limit our definition of scientific discovery to the scientific method. Humanity has always explored the world in order to rule it as a steward of God’s creation at his direction (verse 26). We’re commanded to subdue the earth and rule over the created animals. It’s hard to subdue and rule the earth and its animals if we don’t strive to understand them as best we can. Scientific work, carried out as stewards of God, glorifies God and serves our neighbor.

Read Colossians 1:15-17 and 1 Corinthians 13:12.

How does knowing and trusting the supremacy of Christ help Christians be good scientists?

Trusting the supremacy of Christ in creation gives Christians who work in science the right balance of confidence and humility. They are confident that good science can be done because nature is the orderly work of a Creator who continues to hold all things together. But Christians are also humble because God’s ways are above our ways. His thoughts are above our thoughts. Our knowledge is only in part, as through a mirror dimly. We recognize that we are fallen and have only partial knowledge of things. Letting God be God and thanking him for what we can discover of the workings of his creation is one way we glorify Christ.

Christians also understand that science tells us the way things are, not the way things ought to be. If Christ is supreme over creation, he’s the Creator who tells us the way things ought to be through the revelation of Scripture and the writing of his law in our hearts. Creation cannot tell us things that only the Creator can tell us. This helps keep Christians humble when working as a scientist.

The author is among those who would encourage more Christians to pursue work in the sciences. Scientists are some of the most respected voices in today’s world. Defending the Christian faith should be done vocationally through the whole body of Christ. Let’s not consider the parish pastor the “Bible Answer Man” who is the best source for everything. Christians who have expertise in scientific fields have much to share of how their faith is a part of their work. Do you have scientists in your congregation? Take them out to lunch and ask them about their scientific work as a Christian.

This is the fourth article of a six-part series on faith and science.

*Baruch A. Shalev, 100 Years of Nobel Prizes (2003)

Author: James Borgwardt
Volume 108, Number 04
Issue: April 2021

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Facebook comments

Follow us on Facebook to comment and view